A massive $166 billion windfall is currently sitting in the coffers of the federal government, and the question of who it belongs to has sparked a moral battle in our courts. Following a Supreme Court ruling that certain tariffs were unlawful, retail giants like Costco are racing to claim massive refunds. However, a series of class-action lawsuits allege that these corporations are attempting to commit a historic act of unjust enrichment. The complaint is simple: these retailers already passed the cost of those tariffs onto the American consumer through higher prices at the checkout counter. To now pocket the refund from the government would be to charge the American family twice. This is not a matter of complex trade law; it is a matter of basic honesty. When a business tells its customers that prices are rising because of federal policy, it enters into an unspoken agreement. To later keep the money returned by that same policy—money that came out of the pockets of struggling families—is a violation of the trust that sustains our market. We applaud the plaintiffs in Washington, Ohio, and California who are standing up to this corporate greed. The $166 billion should not go toward executive bonuses or stock buybacks; it must be returned to the people who actually bore the burden. In a time of rising costs and economic uncertainty, our largest retailers must remember that their primary duty is to the communities they serve, not to the opportunistic seizure of a federal windfall.